NHL Game Night 12/26: Lightning at Thrashers
Gee, who do you think the league office in Toronto wants to win the Southeast Division?
The league replay system is a joke, a complete and utter sham. This is the second time this season the Lightning have been robbed of a point on a blatently obvious puck tipped in with a high stick that was allowed. The first time, in Boston, the league spun allowing a goal knocked in by 6'9" Zdeno Chara with the shaft of a stick that was above his eye level into a 4' high net by citing a made up non-existent rule regarding Chara getting cross checked (as if that absolved Chara from his responsibility for carrying his stick at a safe height which is what the high stick rule was instituted to promote). They also did a song and dance claiming that they didn't have all the proper camera angles to make a completely informed decision, as if not having enough information to make an informed ruling somehow made it ok.
Tonight, with less than 9 seconds left in the game, a long wrist shot from the point by Bobby Holik was tipped in by the blade of Jim Slater's stick being carried above both Slater and defenseman Dan Boyle's head. Slater is listed at 6'0" tall. Boyle is between 5'10" and 5'11". The net is 4' tall. It does not take a PHD in physics from MIT to figure out that the puck was tipped in with a high stick. My guess is that the NHL will claim they did not have a definitive angle proving Slater's stick was above the crossbar when the puck was tipped, hoping that you as hockey fans will cast aside simple logic as easily as they have.
Every single person in the league office with a stake in video review should be fired. Period. Point blank. Every single one of them. No matter how you want to look at this, the league is either guilty of bias or it is guilty of incompetence in both the way that the system is set up without all the proper video angles (and, honestly, if that's true I will offer to plunk down the $130 it will take to purchase the Toronto office their own Centre Ice package so they will at least have all the replay angles that I and every other Lightning fan has at their disposal) and in their complete disregard for common sense. We ought to go back to having in-building review judges who have access to all the available camera angles from the TV production crews and so that there is not the seeming of inpropriety of a league operating from on high from some 1,000 miles away manipulating scores to serve an agenda.
Lets quit talking about changing conference structures or making the nets bigger or making the jerseys tighter and start with a more fundamental problem: integrity, or lack thereof, in the league office. Lets fix that before we get to Gary Bettman's next gimmick o' the month. Nah, I can already here what Toronto is saying now, "No, wait, I got a better idea, lets keep the rigged replay system and instead institute the two point goal arc from 'beach roller hockey'."
Do these buffoons ever stop to think what they're doing to this sport?